The rise of online shopping continues to reshape how we buy, from gadget drops to fast fashion hauls. But one problem keeps appearing: missing items and courier-related tampering. Amazon India is now shipping valuable packages with a visible tamper-evident seal that warns customers not to accept a parcel if a pink or red dot appears anywhere on the label. It also includes a QR code that can be scanned to verify authenticity.
Welcome to Root Access – a new WalasTech section where I share editorial opinions on how tech impacts Filipinos. Here, I tackle pressing issues, trends, and topics that challenge the norm in tech, culture, and society. Root Access unpacks complex topics with an unfiltered approach, with new posts published weekly.
At first glance, it looks like a simple sticker. But it sends a strong message: the courier is no longer invisible. The seal shifts responsibility and makes the delivery journey more transparent. If something happened in transit, the box can prove it.
The system is straightforward. If the seal shows a color trigger or looks peeled in any way, the receiver can reject the package immediately. This avoids arguments and lengthy investigations between the buyer and seller. It is packaging as a witness.
Could local online sellers follow this model? In theory—yes. Shopee, Lazada, and TikTok Shop sellers can make use of similar tools:
• Tamper-evident tapes showing VOID once removed
• Color-changing dots like the one Amazon India uses
• QR-based verification stickers
• Seals that shatter when pulled
• Packaging that records opening attempts
This type of seal changes the power balance. It adds pressure to couriers not to alter or peek inside parcels, while giving buyers concrete evidence in case of disputes. It also protects online sellers, especially small merchants, who often get blamed for missing items even if they shipped them correctly.
These methods do not require large investments and can be applied even to single-item parcels. They serve one purpose: to show proof of interference during delivery. If couriers know the seal is designed to expose them, the risk of tampering becomes a deterrent.
But there are local challenges. The Philippines is hot — more often extremely hot. Materials that react to temperature may trigger false alarms during transit. A parcel may leave the warehouse in good condition, but stay inside the rider’s insulated bag under the midday sun. The seal might change color even without tampering. Moisture and humidity may also affect adhesives, and QR labels can fade when exposed to direct sunlight.
There’s also the cost. For small sellers operating on thin margins, any extra packaging requirement eats into profit on top of the overbearing platform and service fees and government requirements. Some might see it as unnecessary, especially when platforms already provide dispute channels.
Still, one question remains: who takes responsibility when a package goes missing after handover to a courier? Tamper-evident seals may be the bridge between trust and accountability. They do not eliminate theft, but they point to when and possibly by whom it happened.
If Amazon India is experimenting with this now, it may only be a matter of time before this becomes standard on sensitive or high-value orders. And when it does, both buyer and seller may finally share the same evidence on the box itself.
Would local e-commerce platforms support tamper-evident packaging if it clearly exposed courier-level theft?
