For decades, Filipinos have been used to long lines, multiple signatories, and folders full of photocopied documents when dealing with government agencies. The bureaucracy has long been criticized as one of the country’s biggest obstacles to ease of doing business. With the signing of Republic Act No. 12254, or the E-Governance Act, the government is now aiming to replace those lines and folders with logins and digital portals.
Welcome to Root Access – a new WalasTech section where I share editorial opinions on how tech impacts Filipinos. Here, I tackle pressing issues, trends, and topics that challenge the norm in tech, culture, and society. Root Access unpacks complex topics with an unfiltered approach, with new posts published weekly.
Why it matters: The law comes at a time when many citizens and businesses are demanding more efficient public services. Other countries in Southeast Asia have already made significant progress in digital governance, leaving the Philippines lagging in global competitiveness rankings. By mandating e-governance across all agencies and local government units, RA 12254 is positioned as a crucial step toward catching up.
At its core, the Act gives the Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) the responsibility of building and managing the country’s digital infrastructure for governance. Agencies and LGUs are required to create online portals or adopt the DICT’s eLGU platform. Frontline services, digital payments, online health systems, and even permit applications must be transitioned to online channels. The law also sets strict timelines, with full implementation expected within three years.
On paper, this could significantly improve the ease of doing business. Entrepreneurs applying for permits could cut down the process to just a few online steps instead of physically hopping from one office to another. Citizens renewing documents or requesting certifications can avoid taking leave from work to spend time waiting at government halls. And with digital payments integrated into official portals, the risk of under-the-table transactions could also be reduced.
But as with all ambitious reforms, execution will be the deciding factor. Past efforts at digitization have shown mixed results. The rollout of the national ID system, for instance, promised a streamlined way to prove identity across services. Yet delays in card distribution and questions about data protection left many Filipinos skeptical. Several government agencies still do not want to accept a digital version of it, much with our experience the other week as they asked me to photocopy my Digital ID for them to have a physical copy. RA 12254 attempts to learn from such experiences by requiring data-sharing standards, interoperability through APIs, and stronger information security measures. Whether agencies can consistently apply these standards is another question.
Funding is another challenge. The law establishes an E-Government Interoperability Fund sourced from spectrum user fees to finance digital transformation projects. While this provides a financial backbone, actual implementation at the local level may still be uneven. Big cities with existing ICT capacity may adapt quickly, but smaller municipalities could struggle without proper technical support.
There is also the matter of inclusivity. The law requires agencies to ensure services remain accessible even to those without internet access. This is important in a country where many areas still have unreliable connectivity. RA 12254 references earlier legislation on free public internet access, but ensuring real and stable coverage nationwide is a much larger task that goes beyond the law itself.
Privacy and security are equally critical. Centralizing government services online means vast amounts of personal and business data will be stored and shared across agencies. The DICT is tasked with setting minimum information security standards; however, a major breach could easily undermine public trust in the system. Businesses, in particular, will want assurance that sensitive financial or corporate data submitted through portals will be adequately protected.
Still, the Act represents a significant acknowledgment that paper-based bureaucracy can no longer keep pace with modern demands. It aligns with ongoing global trends, where governments are leveraging technology to provide faster, more transparent, and more accountable services. For citizens, the potential benefits are obvious: fewer trips to government offices, faster turnaround times, and a more predictable process. For businesses, it could mean improved competitiveness and a more attractive investment climate.
The E-Governance Act is, in many ways, a high-stakes gamble. If it succeeds, it could finally cut through the country’s reputation for red tape and bring public service closer to the standards expected in the digital age. If it falters, it risks becoming another layer of bureaucracy, with agencies building separate systems that don’t talk to each other and citizens caught between paper and digital processes.
RA 12254 opens the door to a new kind of governance. Whether Filipinos walk through a seamless portal or stumble into another maze of half-implemented systems will depend on how seriously agencies take the mandate. The law has given a clear timeline, but the public will be the ultimate judge of whether paperwork truly gives way to portals.
The question now is: will this digital promise finally turn into everyday reality for Filipinos, or will it remain another reform on paper?
